Between Theocratic Republic and Democracy: Government Systems in Iran, the USA, and the UK

Authors

  • Md. Yeasir Arafat Undergraduate student, Department of Political Science, University of Rajshahi
  • Sahed Siddiq Department of Political Science, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh.
  • Anik Kumar Ghosh Department of Political Science, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh.
  • Saurov Kumar Shil Department of Political Science, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58355/dirosat.v4i1.203

Keywords:

Comparative Government, Executive-Legislative-Judicial Systems, Theocratic Republic, Iran-USA-UK

Abstract

From monarchs and presidents to supreme religious leaders, the architecture of power varies—but its essence shapes the fate of nations. This study presents a comparative analysis of the government systems of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the United States of America, and the United Kingdom. It focuses specifically on the structures and functions of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches in each country. While the USA and UK represent two distinct models of democratic governance—a federal republic and a constitutional monarchy respectively—Iran’s theocratic republic offers a unique blend of religious and political authority. Through a structured examination of institutional design, constitutional principles, and practical dynamics, this research reveals both convergences and contrasts among the three systems. The findings highlight how ideological foundations—secular liberalism in the West and Islamic jurisprudence in Iran—significantly shape institutional behavior and power distribution. The study concludes with reflections on the implications of these differences for governance, accountability, and the rule of law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Government and Politics. (1969). The American Political Science Review, 63(2), 565–584. https://doi.org/10.2307/1954721

Amuzegar, J. (2003). Iran’s theocracy under siege. Middle East Policy, 10(1), 135–153.

Arafat, M. Y. (2024). Research ethics: Meaning and principles. International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4887943

Baldini, G., Bressanelli, E., & Massetti, E. (2021). Back to the Westminster model? The Brexit process and the UK political system. International Political Science Review, 43(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120967375

Behbudi, B. (2014, February). The slaughter of democracy by religious tyranny. The Middle East, 24–25.

Berlinski, S., Dewan, T., & Dowding, K. (2012). The structure of British government. In Accounting for ministers: Scandal and survival in British government 1945–2007 (pp. 21–53). Cambridge University Press.

Buchta, W. (2000). Who rules Iran? The structure of power in the Islamic Republic. The Washington Institute for Near East Policy and the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.

Chehabi, H. E. (2001). The political regime of the Islamic Republic of Iran in comparative perspective. Government and Opposition, 36(1), 48–70. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44482928

Conlan, T. J. (2017). The changing politics of American federalism. State & Local Government Review, 49(3), 170–183. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48588873

Dennis, J., & Owen, D. (2001). Popular satisfaction with the party system and representative democracy in the United States. International Political Science Review, 22(4), 399–415. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1601214

Fabbrini, S. (1999). The American system of separated government: An historical-institutional interpretation. International Political Science Review, 20(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512199201005

Fazeli, N. (2006). Politics of culture in Iran: Anthropology, politics, and society in the twentieth century. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Politics-of-Culture-in-Iran/Fazeli/p/book/9781138869790

Jillson, C. (2025). American government: Political development and institutional change (13th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003486176

Keddie, N. R., & Richard, Y. (2006). Modern Iran: Roots and results of revolution. Yale University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5vkwwc

Kenny, M. (2021). Governance, politics and political economy – England’s questions after Brexit. Territory, Politics, Governance, 10(5), 678–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2021.1962732

Kurun, İ. (2017). Iranian political system: “Mullocracy?”. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(1), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.285351

Rigi, J. (2012). Iran at the crossroads of democracy and dictatorship. Focaal: Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 63, 129–145.

Singh, R. (2003). American government and politics: A concise introduction. SAGE. https://sk.sagepub.com/book/mono/american-government-and-politics/toc

Takeyh, R. (2006). Hidden Iran: Paradox and power in the Islamic Republic. Council on Foreign Relations.

Tatham, M. R. (2010). The evolution of the UK political system in the first decade of the new millennium: Comparative and temporal perspectives. In K. Tournier-Sol (Ed.), Le Royaume-Uni dans le monde depuis 2001 (Revue Babel, No. 21, pp. 217–253). Babel. https://hdl.handle.net/1814/15000

Taucar, C. E. (2014). The British system of government and its historical development. McGill–Queen’s University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt130hc72

The American Political System. (1967). The American Political Science Review, 61(4), 1128–1142. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953422

Downloads

Published

2026-02-09

How to Cite

Arafat, M. Y., Sahed Siddiq, Anik Kumar Ghosh, & Saurov Kumar Shil. (2026). Between Theocratic Republic and Democracy: Government Systems in Iran, the USA, and the UK. DIROSAT: Journal of Education, Social Sciences & Humanities, 4(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.58355/dirosat.v4i1.203

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.